The decision to exonerate the arbitrator's financial and technical consultants from any accountability for misconduct and negligence was fundamentally undemocratic.

The government-endorsed arbitrations were ultimately revealed as a misguided criminal scheme meticulously engineered by Telstra, with the primary objective of curtailing their financial losses in a highly strategic manner. This complex deception involved a series of deliberate maneuvers aimed at manipulating the arbitration process, ensuring that the outcomes favored Telstra's interests while grossly undermining principles of equity and justice.

Between June 1997 and March 1999, the Senate undertook a comprehensive investigation that delved deeply into these troubling practices. The inquiry uncovered a multitude of irregularities and conflicts of interest, bringing to light the extent of the manipulation that occurred during the arbitration proceedings. Alarmingly, these findings emerged more than two years after the majority of the arbitrations had concluded, indicating a systemic issue that had not only affected individual cases but had broader implications for trust in the arbitration system as a whole.

The investigation raised profound concerns regarding the integrity of the arbitration process and pointed to potential complicity among various government entities that facilitated, and perhaps even endorsed, these unethical actions. Such revelations sparked a critical dialogue about accountability and the need for substantial reforms to prevent similar abuses in the future.

Chapter 

Exoneration from all liability 

The decision to exonerate the arbitrator's financial and technical consultants from any accountability for misconduct and negligence was fundamentally undemocratic, wholly unconscionable, and immoral. This action compromised the integrity of the arbitration process and established a perilous, dangerous precedent that undermined public trust in subsequent arbitrations.