Tampering With Evidence

‘During testing the Mitsubishi fax machine some alarming patterns of behaviour was noted”. This document further goes on to state: “…Even on calls that were tampered with the fax machine displayed signs of locking up and behaving in a manner not in accordance with the relevant CCITT Group fax rules. Even if the page was sent upside down the time and date and company name should have still appeared on the top of the page, it wasn’t’

During a received call the machine failed to respond at the end of the page even though it had received the entire page (sample #3) The Mitsubishi fax machine remained in the locked up state for a further 2 minutes after the call had terminated, eventually advancing the page out of the machine. (See See AFP Evidence File No 9)

A copy of a letter dated 2 March 1994, from Telstra’s Corporate Solicitor, Ian Row, to Detective Superintendent Jeff Penrose of the Australian Federal Police AFP (see Home Page Part-One File No/9-A to 9-C). This letter makes it quite clear that Mr Penrose was profoundly misled and deceived about the faxing problems I was having to deal with, as discussed in this letter. Over the years, many people have compared the four exhibits numbered (File No/9-C) with the interception evidence revealed in Open Letter File No/12, and File No/13 and promptly concluded that, if Ian Row had not misled the AFP in relation to my faxing issues then the AFP would have been able to stop Telstra from intercepting the various relevant AFP arbitration documents in March 1994, before any damage had been done.

It is essential to highlight how skilfully Mr Row did not disclose to the AFP the problems Telstra had experienced when sending and receiving faxes between my machine and Graham's. So not only did this local Portland Telstra technician pervert the course of justice in his witness statement dated 12 December 1994 to the arbitrator. It is also evident that Ian Row Telstra's Corporate Solicitor misled and deceived Detective Superintendent Jeff Penrose of the Australian Federal Police AFP. Had he and this local Portland technician told the truth concerning my ongoing faxing problems, I would have been able to prove to the arbitrator that my faxing problems were endless and were not old historic phone problems as the arbitrator's award shows. 

I could have also shown the arbitrator that the TF200 touchphone installed into my fax machine was having major lock-up problems, as the following EXICOM reporting shows. In simple terms, I not only had fax hacking problems that were locking up my 055 267230 fax line as See AFP Evidence File No 9 shows, but I also had the known EXICOM TF200 locking up fault. No wonder I had central incoming fax and outgoing telephone calls for years after my arbitration, unaware that all of the EXICOM TF200 phones had locking up faults.