Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

My name is Alan Smith. For more than three decades, I have been trapped inside a malign labyrinth engineered by a predatory telecommunications giant and its willing accomplice, the Australian government. What began in 1992 as a principled pursuit of consumer justice soon revealed itself as something far darker: a subterranean machinery of corruption, a clandestine alliance of compromised politicians, regulatory bodies bent into servitude, a quietly captured judiciary, and the corporate creature now known as Telstra. This is no commercial dispute. It is a state‑sanctioned protection racket, still operating in the shadows, still unpunished.

My descent into this bureaucratic underworld began in 1987. After forty years at sea, I sought a quiet harbour for retirement. Australia appeared safe, civilised, trustworthy. I invested my life savings into the Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp and Convention Centre, performing every due diligence a rational man could. Yet no amount of caution could have prepared me for the truth: the greatest threat to my livelihood was not market forces, but the catastrophic collapse of a government‑owned utility, and the sinister cover‑up that metastasised around it.

Within days of taking ownership, the trap snapped shut. Customers vanished into dead lines. Suppliers fell away into a void of unanswered calls. The business was suffocated, throttled by a phantom telephone network that flickered between erratic and non‑existent. It was not misfortune. It was sabotage by neglect, and the state knew it.

Thus began my passage through the nightmare known as the Casualties of Telecom (COT). Alongside other rural business owners, I found myself confronting a ruthless, state‑backed monopoly. Our demands were modest: acknowledge the network failures, repair the infrastructure, compensate the losses. Instead, they ushered us into a legal ambush crafted with surgical malice.

As our calls for a Senate investigation grew louder, the state recoiled. To avoid scrutiny, officials dangled a poisoned chalice, a private arbitration process dressed in the costume of fairness and transparency. We accepted, unaware that the architecture of betrayal was already in place.

The treachery was immediate. Corporate lawyers and complicit regulators buried critical technical documents, internal network data, and fault records. The evidence required to prove our claims. These documents remain entombed in secrecy. Worse still, as we attempted to defend ourselves, we discovered our communications were being intercepted, monitored, and violated. This was not an accident. It was an operation conducted with impunity under the gaze of those sworn to protect us.

We were crushed beneath the monolithic weight of state power and corporate greed. Our defeat was not unfortunate; it was engineered.

Then came the final act of deception. Through calculated legal manipulation, they coerced us into signing a draconian confidentiality clause masquerading as an agreement. It was not a settlement. It was a gag order, a silencing device designed to bury evidence of state negligence and corporate misconduct. By speaking now, I defy their authoritarian edicts. When law becomes a weapon wielded against the innocent, obedience becomes surrender.

For decades, we have clawed through the obstructionist maze of Freedom of Information requests, seeking the blueprints of our destruction. We know the evidence exists: falsified testing protocols, concealed faults, systemic negligence. Yet the state guards these secrets with feral intensity, protecting its own corruption at any cost.

This is not delusion. It is not conspiracy. It is a chilling reality forged through institutionalised deceit. Public servants, politicians, regulators, and Telstra executives have conspired, actively and deliberately, weaponising the legal system to sacrifice rural Australian businesses and shield a state‑protected monopoly from accountability.

Telstra-Corruption-Freehill-Hollingdale & Page
Telstra-Corruption-Freehill-Hollingdale & Page

Corrupt practices persisted throughout the COT arbitrations, flourishing in secrecy and obscurity. These insidious actions have managed to evade necessary scrutiny. Notably, the phone issues persisted for years following the conclusion of my arbitration, established to rectify these faults

Confronting Despair
Confronting Despair

The independent arbitration consultants demonstrated a concerning lack of impartiality. Instead of providing clear and objective insights, their guidance to the arbitrator was often marked by evasive language, misleading statements, and, at times, outright falsehoods.

Flash Backs – China-Vietnam
Flash Backs – China-Vietnam

In 1967, Australia participated in the Vietnam War. I was on a ship transporting wheat to China, where I learned China was redeploying some of it to North Vietnam. Chapter 7, "Vietnam—Vietcong," discusses the link between China and my phone issues.

A Twenty-Year Marriage Lost
A Twenty-Year Marriage Lost

As bookings declined, my marriage came to an end. My ex-wife, seeking her fair share of our venture, left me with no choice but to take responsibility for leaving the Navy without adequately assessing the reliability of the phone service in my pursuit of starting a business.

Salvaging What I Could
Salvaging What I Could

Mobile coverage was nonexistent, and business transactions were not conducted online. Cape Bridgewater had only eight lines to service 66 families—132 adults. If four lines were used simultaneously, the remaining 128 adults would have only four lines to serve their needs.

Lies Deceit And Treachery
Lies Deceit And Treachery

I was unaware of Telstra's unethical and corrupt business practices. It has now become clear that various unethical organisational activities were conducted secretly. Middle management was embezzling millions of dollars from Telstra.

An Unlocked Briefcase
An Unlocked Briefcase
On June 3, 1993, Telstra representatives visited my business and, in an oversight, left behind an unlocked briefcase. Upon opening it, I discovered evidence of corrupt practices concealed from the government, playing a significant role in the decline of Telstra's telecommunications network.
Not Fit For Purpose (Duplicate 1)
Not Fit For Purpose (Duplicate 1)

AUSTEL investigated the contents of the Telstra briefcases. Initially, there was disbelief regarding the findings, but this eventually led to a broader discussion that changed the telecommunications landscape. I received no acknowledgement from AUSTEL for not making my findings public.
&am

A Government-backed Arbitration
A Government-backed Arbitration

An arbitration process was established to hide the underlying issues rather than to resolve them. The arbitrator, the administrator, and the arbitration consultants conducted the process using a modified confidentiality agreement. In the end, the process resembled a kangaroo court.

A Non-Graded Arbitrator
A Non-Graded Arbitrator

Who granted the financial and technical advisors linked to the arbitrator immunity from all liability regarding their roles in the arbitration process? This decision effectively shields the arbitration advisors from any potential lawsuits by the COT claimants concerning misconduct or negligence.<

The AFP Failed Their Objective
The AFP Failed Their Objective

In September 1994, two officers from the AFP met with me to address Telstra's unauthorised interception of my telecommunications services. They revealed that government documents confirmed I had been subjected to these violations. Despite this evidence, the AFP did not make a finding.&am

The Promised Documents Never Arrived
The Promised Documents Never Arrived

In a February 1994 transcript of a pre-arbitration meeting, the arbitrator involved in my arbitration stated that he "would not determination on incomplete information.". The arbitrator did make a finding on incomplete information.

 

 

Quote Icon

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

Hon David Hawker

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

The Hon David Hawker MP

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us