Chapter 7 You Be The Judge

Extra Chapters Coming Soon

AS - CAV 1 to 47 - AS-CAV 48-A to 91 - AS-CAV 92 to 127 - AS-CAV 128 to 180 - AS-CAV 181 to 233 - AS-CAV 234 to 281 - AS-CAV 282 to 323 - AS-CAV 324-A to 420 - AS-CAV 421 to 469 - AS-CAV 470 to 486 - AS-CAV 488-A to 494-E AS-CAV 495 to 541 -AS-CAV 542 to 588 - AS-CAV 589 to 647 - AS-CAV 648 to 700 - CAV Exhibits 701 to 756 AS-CAV 765-A to 789 - AS-CAV 790 to 818 - AS-CAV 819 to 843 - AS-CAV-923 to 946 AS-CAV 1150 to 1169 - AS-CAV 1069 to 1102 - AS-CAV 1103 to 1132 AS-CAV-1002 to 1019 - AS-CAV-996 to 1001 GS-CAV 1 to 88 - GS-CAV 89 to 154-A - GS-CAV 155 to 215 - GS-CAV 216 to 257 - GS-CAV 258 to 323 - GS-CAV 410-A to 447 - GS-CAV 448 to 458 - GS-CAV 459 to 489 - GS-CAV 490 to 521 - GS-CAV 522 to 580 - GS-CAV 581 to 609

The matters discussed on absentjustice.com are made in the public interest and are therefore made in accordance with the Victorian Defamation Act 2005, Defamation Division 1, Defamation and the general law, see www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web-Note.

Telstra internal memo, 3 November 1993 (AS6 file AS1 to 47).

26/9/1993 (AS6 file AS1 to 47).

Telstra file note 15/8/91 (AS4 file AS1 to 47).

1 September 1992 (AS12 file AS1 to 47).

18 September 1992 (AS13 file AS1 to 47).

12 July 1993 (AS30 file AS1 to 47).

Points 73 to 109 AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings

(AS5 file AS 1 to 47).

13 October 1992 (AS11 file AS 1 to 47).

AS767-A file AS-CAV 765-A to 789

Telstra memo 25 November 1993 to the Corporate Billing Directorate in Brisbane (AS1154 file AS-1150 to 1169).

AS1097 file AS-CAV 1069 to 1102

Telstra fault record (AS1003 file AS-CAV-1002 to 1019).

(See Arbitrator File No 62)

AS694 file AS 648 to 700

Draft Austel Report, 3 March 1994 AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings.

The COT Cases, Austel’s Findings and Recommendations, April 1994 (is a public report).

21 April 1993 (AS1163 file AS-CAV 1150 to 1169

28 September 1993 (AS1164 file AS-CAV 1150 to 1169

pp. 36, 38. Senate Evidence File No 2A & 2B)

Telecom memo, 15/11/93 (AS927 file AS-CAV-923 to 946).

Telstra's Falsified BCI Report and BCI Telstra's M.D.C Exhibits 1 to 46.

Austel to Telstra letter, 9 December 1993 (AS1166 file AS-CAV 1150 to 1169).

AS1167 file AS-CAV 1150 to 1169.

FOI request of 18 October 1995 (AS226 file AS-CAV 181 to 233 ).

6 September 1994 (AS1168 file AS-CAV 1150 to 1169).

Bell Canada International Report, 10 November 1993.

Austel Report: The COT Cases, Table 7.1, p. 157, and points 7.21–7.23.

Cited in Brian Hodge Report (Main Evidence File No 3)

Brian Hodge Cape Bridgewater report (Main Evidence File No 3).

Austel Report: The COT Cases, p. 165, point 7.33.

Exhibit 9-B Telstra’s Falsified BCI Report.

23 August 1994 Exhibit 9-C Telstra’s Falsified BCI Report.

See Senate Hansard, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA - Parliament of Australia

18/11/93 Call For Justice Evidence File 16 to 22 .

The COT Cases: Austel’s Findings and Recommendations, April 1994 (public report).

Exhibit 121 file GS-CAV 89 to 154-A

Arbitrator File No/92 I disagree with raising the issue of the courts etc etc

9 June 1993 Arbitrator File No/93

The COT Cases: Austel’s Findings and Recommendations, April 1994 (public report).

ibid., point 7.39.

ibid.

Internal Telstra email, 26 April 1994 (AS 72 file AS 48-A to 91).

NRR: not receiving ring.

7 April 1994, 2.05 pm, AFP Evidence File No 8).

AFP transcript, question 58 AS-CAV 48-A to 91).

June 1993 (AS518 file AS 495 to 541).

Austel letter to Telstra’s Group General Manager (AS52-B file AS 48-A to 91).

Senate Hansard records 25/2/94, p. A133 file AS 128 to 180.

26 September 1994 (Australian Federal Police Investigation File No/1).

Senate Hansard records Main Evidence File No/29 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE):

Arbitrator File No/83

Arbitrator’s transcript, pp. 100–102 (AS74 file AS 48-A to 91).

In the award, at point 5.3. (While this wording is not grammatical, it is quoted verbatim.)

16 November 1994 (AS 124 file AS-48-A to 91

AS541 file AS-495 to 541

I also provided this sworn statement contained to the Prime Minister’s office and the AFP in 2014.

2 February 1995 (AS 573 file AS-542 to 588).

4 July 1994, letter to Telstra’s (AS 85 file AS-48-A to 91)

Question 57, p. 12 Australian Federal Police Investigation File No/1

Australian Senate Hansard, 29 November 1994, p. 12 (AS 87 file AS-48-A to 91)

AS1000 file AS-CAV-996 to 1001

Telstra’s T-200 Report (Tampering With Evidence).

AS634 file AS-589 to 647

AS147-B file AS-128 to 180

AS1126; AS1127 file AS-1103 to 1132

AS665-B file AS-648 to 700

AS665-A file AS-648 to 700

(Exhibit 238 file AS-CAV 234 to 281 confirms on page two, I raised these Commonwealth Ombudsman billing issues with Telstra’s Lyn Chisholm on 14/1/98

DMR & Lane draft and final almost identical reports see also Prologue/Chapter One to Four

Prologue/Chapter Two

AS179 file AS-128 to 180 and Prologue/Chapter Two

Names have deleted to protect individual Telstra employees. (See Summary of events).

Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp award, p. 28.

19/3/94 (AS1153 file AS-1150 to 1169 -).

Tampering With Evidence.

Letter from Nosworthy, 10 April 2002 (AS713 file AS 701 to 756).

AS205 file AS-181 to 233

AS 179 file AS 128 to 180.

16 February 1996 (AS157 file AS 128 to 180).

See Financial Review, and .http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfochamberhansards1999-03-11

Letter from the Attorney General Department, 18 August 1998 (AS1187).

Arbitration transcript, pp. 31 and 32 (AS101 file AS-CAV 92 to 127).

Their file notes, AS 498 file AS-CAV 495 to 541

AS 104 file AS-CAV 92 to 127.

AS 201 file AS-CAV 181 to 233.

AS 788A to AS 792B file AS-CAV 765-A to 789.

AS 257 file AS-CAV 234 to 281.

AS 220.

Frank Blount, Bob Joss, Managing in Australia, 1999, pp. 132–3.

8 November 2002 (AS643 file AS 589 to 647).

7 November 2002 (AS167 file AS 128 to 180).

23 January 2003 (AS565 file AS 542 to 588).

4 September 2006 (AS520 file AS-CAV 495 to 541).

23 February 2007 Main Evidence File No 3 / Our Saga File N0 3-A to 3-Cs and Bad Bureaucrats/Chapter Five

Page 99 Senate Hansard – Parliament of Australia.

January 2009 (see Open Letter File No/12 and File No/13).

AS 715 file CAV Exhibits 701 to 756.

(Front Page Part One File No/14).

add AS number a nd date:

1. In September of 1967, I brought to the attention of the Australian government that a portion of the wheat allocated to the People's Republic of China on humanitarian grounds was being redirected to North Vietnam during the Vietnam War. Chapter 7- Vietnam - Vietcong

2. Who else in the Australian government was aware that Australian wheat intended for a starving communist China was being redirected to North Vietnam to feed the North Vietnamese soldiers before those soldiers marched into the jungles of North Vietnam to kill and maim Australian, New Zealand, and United States of America troops? Refer to Footnotes 82 to 85 FOOD AND TRADE IN LATE MAOIST CHINA,1960-1978, prepared by Tianxiao Zhu, who even reports the name of our ship, the Hopepeak and how the seaman feared for our lives if we were forced to return to China with another cargo of Australian wheat. Australian wheat was being redeployed to North Vietnam during the period when Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America fought the Viet Cong in the jungles of North Vietnam.

3. During the 1960s, the Australian Liberal-Country Party Government engaged in misleading conduct regarding trade with Communist China despite being cognizant of the fact that Australian merchant seamen had vehemently refused to transport Australian wheat to China. The grounds for such an objection were their apprehension that the wheat would be redirected from Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America to North Vietnam. The underlying inquiry is to ascertain the government's rationale for deliberately deceiving the general public and jeopardising the country's troops whose lives were being lost in the conflict in North Vietnam. Murdered for Mao: The killings China 'forgot'

4. Why didn't Australia's Trade Minister, John McEwen, correctly and honestly advise the people of Australia why the crew of the British ship Hopepeak had refused to take any more Australian wheat to China because they had witnessed its redeployment to North Vietnam during their first visit to China?