Chapter Four Distorted and unlawful.

Tampering with evidence, or evidence tampering, is an act in which a person alters, conceals, falsifies, or destroys evidence with the intent to interfere with an investigation (usually) by a law-enforcement, governmental, or regulatory authority. It is a criminal offense in many jurisdictions

If tampering with evidence submitted after it had been provided to the Arbitration Process for assessment i.e.: introducing a foreign substance into equipment after it left my premises, and the submitting this falsified evidence to an Arbitrator in an official Arbitration Process conducted under the Arbitration Act (Victoria) 1984 is not committing a crime, then what is?

Tampering with evidence after it has been provided, by a claimant to an arbitration process, and rendering that evidence into a different format has as to be possibly the worst crime a defendant (in this case Telstra) can commit during a legal arbitration process. Why, when this evidence was provided to Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman John Pinnock, TIO counsel chair The Hon Tony Staley, Telstra board chair David Hoare and Telstra CEO Ziggy Switkowski, was it not investigated in May 1998? Telstra’s own internal investigations uncovered this unlawful conduct. Mr Ziggy Switkowski AO has since been awarded the Order of Australia even though he has sat on this crime for more than 18 years.

Why didn’t the Telstra board remove this tampered-with evidence from their arbitration defence of my claims when their internal investigation unit clarified Telstra had indeed acted outside of the law by tampering with this evidence and concocting a false report on this issue? Just as importantly, why hasn’t the current board, who are also aware their own findings found my claims to be correct, not advised the government they have a moral as well as a legal obligation to rectify these wrongs?

To be continued...

The matters discussed on this website absentjustice.com are said according to my interpretation of the

Download Attachments

Contact Absent Justice

Read Alan’s book
A true story

Spying during the COT arbitration by public servants were tolerated by the Australian government during the COT arbitrations as well as during their own business dealin, including the use of electronic surveillance equipment, to gain an illegal advantage over litigants during court proceedings and private negotiations. See Chapter 4 Government spying/Scandrett & Associates facsimile interception report, Open Letter File No/12 and File No/13.
Unaddressed threats carried out by the Telstra Corporation against the COT Cases during their arbitrations. See Senate Evidence File No 31
Withholding important discovery documents in an arbitration procedure: Absent Justice Part 2 - Chapter 14 - Was it Legal or Illegal?
Tampering with evidence in the arbitration: Tampering With Evidence.
Relying on defence documents that are known to be flawed: Telstra’s Falsified BCI Report);
AUSTEL (for the government) concealed vital evidence from the arbitration process that would have won my case: AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings at points 2 to 212.
The arbitrator ordered the removal of vital evidence from two reports: Refer to Chapter 1 - The collusion continues and Chapter 2 - Inaccurate and Incomplete
Organized crime via the Telstra network, i.e. telephone calls and faxed documents intended for one business being redirected to another with the proceeds of that directed information earning the criminals involved millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains Refer to Chapter 4 Government spying and Australian Federal Police Investigations-1Fraud allegations against Telstra during the COT arbitrations were registered with the Major Fraud Group Victoria Police by Barrister Sue Owens, only to be squashed under pressure by the Australian government (see following transcripts Major Fraud Group Transcript (2))

Chapter Four Distorted and unlawful.

Download Attachments

Read Alan’s book A true story

Read Alan’s book
A true story