Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

Chapter Four Distorted and unlawful.


Tampering with evidence, or evidence tampering, is an act in which a person alters, conceals, falsifies, or destroys evidence with the intent to interfere with an investigation (usually) by a law-enforcement, governmental, or regulatory authority. It is a criminal offense in many jurisdictions

If tampering with evidence submitted after it had been provided to the Arbitration Process for assessment  i.e.: introducing a foreign substance into equipment after it left my premises, and the submitting this falsified evidence to an Arbitrator in an official Arbitration Process conducted under the Arbitration Act (Victoria) 1984 is not committing a crime, then what is? 

Tampering with evidence after it has been provided, by a claimant to an arbitration process, and rendering that evidence into a different format has as to be possibly the worst crime a defendant (in this case Telstra) can commit during a legal arbitration process. Why, when this evidence was provided to Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman John Pinnock, TIO counsel chair The Hon Tony Staley, Telstra board chair David Hoare and Telstra CEO Ziggy Switkowski, was it not investigated in May 1998? Telstra’s own internal investigations uncovered this unlawful conduct. Mr Ziggy Switkowski  AO has since been awarded the Order of Australia even though he has sat on this crime for more than 18 years.

Why didn’t the Telstra board remove this tampered-with evidence from their arbitration defence of my claims when their internal investigation unit clarified Telstra had indeed acted outside of the law by tampering with this evidence and concocting a false report on this issue? Just as importantly, why hasn’t the current board, who are also aware their own findings found my claims to be correct, not advised the government they have a moral as well as a legal obligation to rectify these wrongs?

To be continued...

The matters discussed on this website absentjustice.com are said according to my interpretation of the 

© 2017 Absent Justice

Download Attachments

Tampering With Evidence File No 1-A to 1-C
Tampering With Evidence File No 2
Tampering With Evidence File No 3
Tampering With Evidence File No 4
Tampering With Evidence File No 5
Tampering With Evidence File No 6
Tampering With Evidence File No 7
Tampering With Evidence File No 8-A to 8-C
Tampering With Evidence File No 9
Tampering With Evidence File No/10
Tampering With Evidence File 11-A to 11-B
Tampering With Evidence File No/12-A to 12-E
"...I believe that it should be pointed out to Coopers & Lybrand that unless this report is withdrawn and revised their future in relation to Telecom may be irreparably damaged."
Tampering With Evidence File No 13
Tampering With Evidence File No 14
AXE Faulty Equipment

© 2021Absent Justice

Absent Justice - The Peoples Republic of China

It is essential to ascertain the rationale behind Telstra's arbitration unit overseeing my telephone conversations with the former Australian Prime Minister, Malcolm Fraser, between 1993 and 1994. These discussions pertained to my efforts in appraising the Australian government for redirecting our country's wheat exports to communist China, which were subsequently rerouted to North Vietnam when Australian, New Zealand, and United States troops were engaged in combat operations in that region. Clarification on this matter has never been provided.

In September of 1967, I brought to the attention of the Australian government that a portion of the wheat allocated to the People's Republic of China on humanitarian grounds was being redirected to North Vietnam during the Vietnam War Chapter 7- Vietnam - Vietcong

In January 2024, for the second or third time since 2021, I read through the paper FOOD AND TRADE IN LATE MAOIST CHINA, 1960-1978prepared by Tianxiao Zhu. Between Footnote 82 to 85 - T Zhu names not only the Hopepeak ship, which I was on between 28 June and 18 September 1967 (refer to British Seaman’s Record R744269 - Open Letter to PM File No 1 Alan Smiths Seaman), he tells the story the way it happened (I was there) not the way the government of the day told it to the people of Australia in 1967 through to the present. The Australian Minister of Trade and Industry, Sir John McEwen, referred to by Tianxiao Zhu as having stated the British seafarers of the Hopepeak ship were fearful of going back to China, was only an afterthought after being flown from Sydney back to England. When John McEwen knew full well, this was not an afterthought

During the 1960s, the Australian Liberal-Country Party Government engaged in misleading conduct regarding trade with Communist China despite being cognizant that Australian merchant seamen had vehemently refused to transport Australian wheat to China. The grounds for such an objection were their apprehension that the wheat would be redirected to North Vietnam during the North Vietnam War between Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America. The underlying inquiry is to ascertain the government's rationale for deliberately deceiving the general public and jeopardising the country's troops whose lives were being lost in the conflict in North Vietnam.  Murdered for Mao: The killings China 'forgot'

Why didn't Australia's Trade Minister, John McEwen, correctly and honestly advise the people of Australia why the crew of the British ship Hopepeak had refused to take any more Australian wheat to China because they had witnessed its redeployment to North Vietnam during their first visit to China?  

Quote Icon

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“A number of people seem to be experiencing some or all of the problems which you have outlined to me. …

“I trust that your meeting tomorrow with Senators Alston and Boswell is a profitable one.”

Hon David Hawker MP

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

Hon David Hawker

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

The Hon David Hawker MP

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us