Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

Chapter Four Distorted and unlawful.


Tampering with evidence, or evidence tampering, is an act in which a person alters, conceals, falsifies, or destroys evidence with the intent to interfere with an investigation (usually) by a law-enforcement, governmental, or regulatory authority. It is a criminal offense in many jurisdictions

If tampering with evidence submitted after it had been provided to the Arbitration Process for assessment  i.e.: introducing a foreign substance into equipment after it left my premises, and the submitting this falsified evidence to an Arbitrator in an official Arbitration Process conducted under the Arbitration Act (Victoria) 1984 is not committing a crime, then what is? 

Tampering with evidence after it has been provided, by a claimant to an arbitration process, and rendering that evidence into a different format has as to be possibly the worst crime a defendant (in this case Telstra) can commit during a legal arbitration process. Why, when this evidence was provided to Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman John Pinnock, TIO counsel chair The Hon Tony Staley, Telstra board chair David Hoare and Telstra CEO Ziggy Switkowski, was it not investigated in May 1998? Telstra’s own internal investigations uncovered this unlawful conduct. Mr Ziggy Switkowski  AO has since been awarded the Order of Australia even though he has sat on this crime for more than 18 years.

Why didn’t the Telstra board remove this tampered-with evidence from their arbitration defence of my claims when their internal investigation unit clarified Telstra had indeed acted outside of the law by tampering with this evidence and concocting a false report on this issue? Just as importantly, why hasn’t the current board, who are also aware their own findings found my claims to be correct, not advised the government they have a moral as well as a legal obligation to rectify these wrongs?

To be continued...

The matters discussed on this website absentjustice.com are said according to my interpretation of the 

© 2017 Absent Justice

Download Attachments

Tampering With Evidence File No 1-A to 1-C
Tampering With Evidence File No 2
Tampering With Evidence File No 3
Tampering With Evidence File No 4
Tampering With Evidence File No 5
Tampering With Evidence File No 6
Tampering With Evidence File No 7
Tampering With Evidence File No 8-A to 8-C
Tampering With Evidence File No 9
Tampering With Evidence File No/10
Tampering With Evidence File 11-A to 11-B
Tampering With Evidence File No/12-A to 12-E
"...I believe that it should be pointed out to Coopers & Lybrand that unless this report is withdrawn and revised their future in relation to Telecom may be irreparably damaged."
Tampering With Evidence File No 13
Tampering With Evidence File No 14
AXE Faulty Equipment

© 2021Absent Justice

Absent Justice Ebook

Read Alan's book

It is crucial to highlight that the Australian Liberal National Party government was willing to go to war in Iraq based on a lie, regardless of the consequences. The government ignored the fact that there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction and initiated a war that led to the loss of many lives. If you continue reading my story, you will see that back in the 1960s, the same Liberal-Country Party government was willing to sell wheat to China, knowing that China was redeploying some of this wheat to North Vietnam while Australia, New Zealand, and the USA were being killed and maimed by the North Vietnamese in the jungles of Vietnam. The government's priority was not the welfare of its citizens but rather its own interests.

As a concerned citizen, I had previously alerted the then-Minister of the Army, Malcolm Fraser, about China's redeployment of Australian wheat to North Vietnam in 1967. The wheat was used to feed North Vietnamese soldiers who were at war with Australia, New Zealand, and the USA. However, despite my warning, Australia continued to sell wheat to China, as shown in Chapter 7- Vietnam-Vietcong.

Australia knowingly sold wheat to China, aware China was redeploying it to North Vietnam while North Vietnam soldiers were killing and maiming Australian, New Zealand and USA troops fighting in North Vietnam. I ask every visitor to this website to read footnotes 82 to 89 of the paper FOOD AND TRADE IN LATE MAOIST CHINA, 1960-1978, prepared by Tianxiao Zhu. ​​

It was essential to highlight this unethical conduct by the Australian Liberal National Party government because that same government lied and misled the COT Cases in 2006 to enter a review process of their previous 1994/95 arbitrations when government records show the government had no intention of valuing their 2006 review claims "on their merit". Who would believe a government would do such a thing, allowing the claimants (Australian citizens) to spend thousands of dollars to prove their 2006 claims when the government assessing those claims had already confided in writing that those claims were NOT to "be valued on their merit"? 

Exposing a shocking account of Australian public servants knowingly trading with the enemy during a war where that enemy was mercilessly slaughtering and maiming fellow Australian citizens as well as our allies has been an arduous task. It is inconceivable that a government public servant would send a citizen to war and simultaneously provide the enemy with food to aid in killing that very citizen. This is precisely why I had to bring up the Iraq and China wheat deals. Without doing so, my COT story would not have been credible enough to be believed. Rest assured that the truth cannot remain hidden forever!

Quote Icon

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

The Hon David Hawker MP

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us