Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

Contact - Government Corruption

 

If it was not Julian Assange, then who was it?

Absent Justice - Unresolved Privacy Issues

What type of evidence were these hackers concerned about?

This statutory declaration, Hacking – Julian Assange File No/3prepared by Graham Schorer, COT Cases spokesperson, confirms hackers (more than likely a young Julian Assange) did telephone Mr Schorer during the COT arbitrations. This statutory declaration also shows the offices of two COT cases that were broken into, where only Telstra government records were stolen. What were the thieves looking for? Why were two of my central diaries also taken from my office, which confirmed I was having regular discussions with two different psychologists concerning the ordeal I had suffered under detention in Communist China?

WikiLeak exposing the truth suggests that when Julian Assange told Graham Schorer that Telstra and the government were acting unlawfully towards us, and were these illegal acts during our government-endorsed arbitrations to stop us COT Cases from wholly proving our claims concerning the systemic billing problems in Telstra's telecommunications software as pages 36 to 39 Senate - Parliament of Australia suggests. 

Could this statement by the hackers be connected to the actions of my alerting the Australian government on 18 September 1967 that Australian wheat sold to Communist China was being redeployed to North Vietnam while Australia, New Zealand and the USA were at War with North Vietnam? (Refer to Chapter 7- Vietnam-Vietcong).

It appears from the most recent British Post Office scandal https://youtu.be/MyhjuR5g1Mc and the British government's awareness that the software billing problems in their Post Offices were systemic, causing massive problems for the sub-post Officers where their lives were turned upside down (see Mr Bates vs The Post Office - Absent Justice) is similar to the Telstra systemic billing problems that destroyed so many businesses in Australia and have so far been concealed. In my case, Telstra even went as far as to tamper with my TF200 telephone collected from my business during my arbitrator in an attempt to hide the billing problems in Telstra's billing software, as the following shows.

 Absent Justice - TF200 EXICOM telephone

After Mr Anderson completed his testing on 27 April, the phone took nine days to reach Telstra's laboratory. It arrived on 6 May, and laboratory testing did not commence for another four days. Ray Bell, the author of the TF 200 report, was adamant at point 1.3, under the heading Initial Inspection, that:

“The suspect TF200 telephone when received was found to be very dirty around the keypad with what appeared to be a sticky substance, possibly coffee.” (See Tampering With Evidence File No 3)

A second photo I received under FOI is taken from the front of the same TF200 phone, confirming a note I placed on the phone was exceptionally clean when it was received at Telstra. See Open Letter File No/37 exhibits 3, 4, 5 and 6.

This report raises several questions. When the phone left my office, it was pretty clean. Why did it arrive at the laboratory in such a filthy state? How did the beer get inside the phone? Who would have a reason to pour beer into the phone and why? If the addition of beer was not deliberate, how did it get inside the phone? The main aim of Telstra's submitted report, used as evidence, was to prove Telstra's service was not at fault.

 Email contact - absentjustice@gmail.com 

Click for New Security Code
Absent Justice Ebook

Read Alan's book

How can one publish a true account of what happened during various Australian Government-endorsed arbitrations without attaching exhibits to support the facts, as we have been forced to do due to the rampant corruption within the government bureaucracy? How can the author prove that government public servants fed privileged information to the then Australian Government-owned telecommunications carrier (the defendants) but also concealed the same documentation from the claimants, their fellow Australian citizens?

Additionally, how can one tell a story so unbelievable that even the author doubts the authenticity of what they are writing until they check their records before continuing with the story? How can one expose collusion between an arbitrator, various appointed government watchdogs (umpire), and the defendants? How can one also expose that the defendants in an arbitration process (the once government-owned telecommunications carrier) used equipment connected to their network to screen faxed material leaving your office? 

Moreover, how can one expose that the defendant's advisors stored the screened material without the author's knowledge or consent before redirecting it to its intended destination, where, in some cases, the more relevant information was never forwarded? The defendants (the Telstra Corporation) were using this screened material to benefit their arbitration defence to the detriment of the claimants.

Quote Icon

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

The Hon David Hawker MP

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

Hon David Hawker

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us