Kangaroo - Court
Absentjustice - Kangaroo Court
A kangaroo court (see following link > Kangaroo court - Wikipedia is a judicial tribunal or assembly that blatantly disregards recognized standards of law or justice, and often carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides. The term may also apply to a court held by a legitimate judicial authority who intentionally disregards the court's legal or ethical obligations.
A kangaroo court is often held to give the appearance of a fair and just trial, even though the verdict has in reality already been decided before the trial has begun. This could be because of the biases of the decision-maker, or because the structure and operation of the forum result in an inferior brand of adjudication. A common example of this is when institutional disputants ("repeat players") have excessive and unfair structural advantages over individual disputants ("one-shot players").
The statement made on > Kangaroo court - Wikipedia"A kangaroo court is often held to give the appearance of a fair and just trial, even though the verdict has in reality already been decided before the trial has begun", is exactly what happened during the various Casualties of Telstra (COT for short) arbitrations i.e. the arbitrator and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) collaborated with the defendants (Telstra) to use their proposed rules of arbitration arbitration instead of the agreed rules that were supposed to have been drafted independently. Out story shows not only did the arbitrator write to the TIO 12 May 1995 (see absentjustice.com download attachment Main Evidence File No/34) telling him the arbitration agreement was not a credible document to be using, he used it regardless of this advice and then concealed this written advice from the COT Cases during their designated appeal period
|
