Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

Visitors to this website have drawn parallels between its content and a comprehensive portrayal of criminal activities encompassing fraud.

Learn about horrendous crimes, unscrupulous criminals, and corrupt politicians and lawyers who control the legal profession in Australia. Shameful, hideous, and treacherous are just a few words that describe these lawbreakers. 

You can access my book 'Absent Justice' here → Order Now—it's FreeIt presents a compelling narrative that addresses critical societal issues related to justice and equity within Australia's arbitration and mediation processes. If you see the value in the research and evidence behind this important work, consider supporting  Transparency International Australia! Your donation will help raise awareness about the injustices that impact our democracy.  

All of the main events highlighted on this website are backed by original documents (confirmation data) linked within the text. By clicking these links, you will open a PDF of the relevant exhibits. This method allows you to follow the various file numbers discussed throughout our pages – see the menu bar above – enabling you to verify our claims. Without these documents, many would struggle to comprehend the extent of suffering endured by Casualty of Telstra (COT) claimants under these unjust circumstances. We’ve added mini-stories to contextualise these exhibits, allowing readers to grasp the true significance of what occurred.

Until the late 1990s, the Australian government owned the country's telecommunications network and the communications carrier, Telecom (now privatised and known as Telstra). This monopoly led to a catastrophic decline in service quality, as the network fell into disrepair. Instead of addressing the unacceptable state of our telephone services as part of the government-endorsed arbitration process—an inherently uneven fight that none of us could win—these issues remained unresolved. It was a battle that cost claimants hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet the crimes committed against us went unacknowledged. Our integrity was viciously attacked, our livelihoods destroyed, and we lost millions, all while our mental health deteriorated. Shockingly, those who orchestrated this corruption continue to wield power today, reinforcing a façade that hides the truth. Our story remains actively suppressed.

How do you publish a harrowing account of treachery and deceit that has marred various Australian Government-endorsed Arbitrations, all while being denied the exhibits that bear witness to this corruption? How does the author substantiate claims that government public servants shamelessly fed privileged information to the Australian Government-owned telecommunications carrier—an entity that stands as a defendant—yet simultaneously concealed crucial documentation from their own fellow citizens, the claimants? 

It’s a tale so entrenched in villainy that even the author finds themselves questioning the very authenticity of their narrative, only to be jolted back to reality by their meticulously kept records. How can one expose the insidious collusion between an arbitrator, appointed government watchdogs, and the defendants? How do you reveal that the defendants—in this case, the Telstra Corporation—engaged in a repugnant scheme where they intercepted and screened confidential communications, storing sensitive material without consent, and then redirected this information to undermine the claimants' position?

The blatant exploitation by Telstra, using this intercepted material to bolster their defence, raises grave concerns about how many other Australian arbitration processes have succumbed to similar heinous acts of electronic eavesdropping. This abhorrent hacking—was it merely a dark chapter of the past, or does it continue to poison legitimate Australian arbitrations today? In January 1999, the arbitration claimants submitted an alarming report to the Australian Government, confirming that confidential documents had been illicitly screened before being delivered to Parliament House in Canberra. Will that damning report ever be laid bare for the Australian public to see?

I've taken the bold step to release the full report on my website, absentjustice.com, and in my new book, ABSENT JUSTICE—a manifesto against this unprincipled conduct.

Fast Track Arbitration Procedure  

In August 1993, alarmed by the mounting complaints from citizens—including myself—who had purchased businesses under the premise of reliable telephone services, the Australian Government sanctioned a so-called arbitration and mediation process. Yet, in a shocking turn of events in March 1994, the Government Communications Regulator uncovered that the still-government-owned telecommunications carrier was well aware of the faults plaguing my business but chose to bury that knowledge, a sinister act that tainted the arbitration process overseen by the appointed arbitrator.

It is utterly unfathomable that the Australian Government would endorse a legally binding Arbitration Agreement purportedly drafted by the President of the Australian Institute of Arbitrators, when in fact it was scripted by the very lawyers representing the defendants—the government-owned telecommunications carrier. The corruption deepens with the revelation that this same government refused to investigate the incorporation of a clause crafted by the defendant's lawyers, one that severely restricted the claimants' access to the discovery documents essential for supporting their case!

A Project Manager, commissioned by the Australian Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO), was given carte blanche to assist the arbitrator in nine separate arbitrations, mine included. Armed with the defendants' approval, he and his team, without notifying any of the claimants, insidiously sifted through critical documents and decided which would be revealed to the arbitrator and which would be hidden away. 

Potential litigants in Australia and Hong Kong should be deeply alarmed: this same Project Manager now operates as a practising arbitrator with offices in both locations. My manuscript, 'Absent Justice', unearths how this resource unit deliberately suppressed four vital documents from the arbitrator during my arbitration, a disgraceful act that saved the defence countless dollars in compensation. Had the arbitrator reviewed those documents, the outcome of my case could have fundamentally changed, saving countless other Australian businesses from suffering the same egregious telephone billing issues.

On November 15, 1995, when the TIO confronted this Project Manager about the alarming absence of key billing claim documents from the arbitrator, he chose the path of deceit, misleading and manipulating the very organisation meant to uphold justice. Over the past thirty years, I have amassed more than 1,230 pages of evidence, a testament to this scandal—one that must be unveiled to ensure such unconscionable conduct does not continue to plague our systems.

In my quest for truth, I have meticulously gathered an impressive collection of 151 mini-reports, each delving into different aspects of this complex ordeal. These reports capture the nuances and intricacies of the situation, providing a comprehensive overview of my findings. Alongside this significant body of work, I have authored a book titled "Abent Justice," which offers a thorough exploration of the themes and challenges I’ve encountered. This book is freely available for download, making it accessible to anyone interested in the subject. Now, at the age of 81, I am excited to embark on creating my second book, "The Brief Case," which promises to reveal even deeper insights and compelling perspectives on the issues at hand.

Here are six examples derived from 151 similar examples that delve into the intricate realm of corruption in government-endorsed arbitrations involving Telstra. 1. **Government Corruption - Gaslighting** www.absentjustice.com/tampering-with-evidence/government-corruption--gaslighting. Explore: This insightful article examines the troubling intersection of government corruption and psychological manipulation, specifically through the lens of the Julian Assange case. It uncovers a complex narrative of control, deceit, and the significant power dynamics at play in the arbitrations. Who truly held the reins during these crucial proceedings? 2. **Chapter 2 - Inaccurate and Incomplete** www.absentjustice.com/manipulating-the-regulator/who-was-controlling-the-arbitrations-? Corrupt: This section highlights how certain government practices intensify issues of inequality, poverty, social division, and environmental degradation. It emphasizes the urgency of exposing corruption and demanding accountability from those in power to foster a fairer society. 3. **Government Corruption Contact** www.absentjustice.com/contact--government-corruption Get: Stay connected and informed about pressing government corruption issues with Absent Justice. We invite you to reach out and become an active participant in our crucial fight for transparency and accountability in governance. 4. **Government Spying Chapter 4** www.absentjustice.com/australian-federal-police-investigations-1/afp-investigation-2/chapter--4-government-spying. Explore: In this compelling chapter, readers are invited to uncover shocking revelations about government surveillance as detailed in AFP Investigation 2. This investigation seeks to shine a light on the dark side of government spying, underscoring the imperative for transparency and the protection of civil liberties. 5. **WikiLeaks exposing the truth** www.absentjustice.com/manipulating-the-regulator/legal-bullying-in-arbitration/chapter-3-dishonestly-using-corrupt-government-influence: Dive into Chapter 3 of 'Tampering with Evidence' to reveal unsettling truths about the manipulation and exploitation of government influence for corrupt purposes. This chapter on Absent Justice takes a hard look at how systemic dishonesty undermines public trust. 6. **Chapter 1 - The Collusion Continues** www.absentjustice.com/price-waterhouse-coopers-deloitte/chapter-1-the-collusion-continues: Initiate your journey into the dark underbelly of ongoing collusion in Chapter 1 of 'Unconscionable Conduct.' Here, Absent Justice meticulously uncovers a web of continuous unethical practices, shedding light on the pervasive complicity within institutions.

Don't forget to hover your mouse or cursor over the following images as you scroll down his home page 

 

Absent Justice - Telstra Copper Network 

 

The type of corroded copper wire problems I was required to register in writing with Freehill Hollingdale & Page (now trading as Herbert Smith Freehills Melbourne), which I, along with approximately 120,000 other COT-type Australian citizens, experienced, reflects the serious shortcomings in the government's investigation of our claims. My concerns, including those related to the lack of action from the government regulator AUSTEL (now ACMA), were warranted, especially given that the arbitrator and Telstra did not rectify my ongoing billing claims during the arbitration process allowing these ongoing unadresed arbitration problems to ruin the lives of the new owners of my business Jenny and Daren Lewis, who purchased it in December 2001 → Chapter 4 The New Owners Tell Their Story and Chapter 5 Immoral - Hypocritical Conduct.

At that time, Telstra was entirely owned by the Australian Government, which meant that the four COT Cases—myself, Ann Garms, Maureen Gilland, and Graham Schorer—were essentially preparing to take on the Government itself, a formidable opponent with a seemingly endless supply of public funds to fight us. The harsh reality was that we signed the Fast Track Settlement Proposal on November 23, 1994, under immense pressure, feeling cornered and outmatched.

What we didn’t know was that a treacherous betrayal was unfolding behind the scenes. Warwick Smith, the administrator of the FTSP and a former government politician now serving as the Australian Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO), was secretly leaking confidential information directly to Telstra’s top brass (see TIO Evidence File No 3-A). This under-the-table deal involved information from government party rooms vital to the COT Cases, ultimately eroding the already fragile integrity of the FTSP. The situation forced us into a labyrinthine and punishing arbitration agreement, meticulously crafted by Telstra’s legal wolves. From the very start, the entire process was a rigged game, a Kangaroo Court. 

Adding insult to injury, Dr. Gordon Hughes, the FTSP assessor (who later became the arbitrator), was not merely a passive observer but had a checkered history of manipulating facts. He had previously concealed critical information from Graham Schorer when acting as his lawyer in a Federal Court case against Telstra three years earlier. This dark web of corruption and deceit was meticulously woven around us, revealing the lengths to which those in power would go to protect their interests and silence our fight. The sinister machinations at play would soon become clear in the subsequent revelations, as outlined in the following (Chapter 3 - Conflict of Interest) documentation.

 

Gaslighting 

Wayne Goss, the former Premier of Queensland, disclosed that gaslighting tactics were employed against the COT Cases → (See File Ann Garms 104 Document)

 

Gaslighting - Absent Justice

Psychological manipulation 

As detailed below and throughout this website, there was a concerted effort to prevent the COT Cases from substantiating their claims at all costs. I faced tremendous pressure to withhold crucial technical documents that I had previously submitted to Freehill Hollingdale & Page, the legal representatives for Telstra. They threatened me with retaliation, insisting that unless I first presented my fault complaints in writing to Freehill, Telstra would categorically refuse to investigate my grievances.

When I reluctantly provided those documented complaints to Denise McBurnie, the lawyer assigned to my case at Freehill, I was met with immediate dismissal. Mr. McBurnie spoke to me over the phone, characterising my legitimate concerns as vexatious and unfounded. Yet, despite his attempt to undermine my complaints, she never dared to officially declare them invalid. This condescending approach, marked by ridicule from the opposing side, was a clear example of the gaslighting tactics employed against the COT Cases, further complicating our struggle for justice.
 
On 1 June 2021, Mathias Cormann officially assumed office as the Secretary-General of the OECD in Paris, France. Similarly to Australia's former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, he possesses comprehensive knowledge about the legitimacy of the COT Cases claims.  
 
 
French Flag - Absent Justice

 

Don't forget to hover your mouse/cursor over the kangaroo image to the right of this page → → →

Kangaroo Court - Absent Justice

The looming shadows of four letters—dated August 17, 2017, October 6, 2017, October 9, 2017, and October 10, 2017—written by COT Case Ann Garms shortly before her tragic passing, embody a haunting significance (See File Ann Garms 104 Document). Addressed to The Hon. Malcolm Turnbull MP, Australia’s then-Prime Minister, and Senator the Hon. Mathias Cormann, these letters reveal layers of betrayal and unearthly horror. The attachment from Ann's August 6 letter remains a chilling testament to her insight, underscoring secrets that many would wish to keep buried. 

On June 1, 2021, Mathias Cormann assumed a pivotal role as Secretary-General of the OECD in Paris. His deep knowledge of the COT Cases claims only amplifies the urgency of what Ann wrote, as whispers of accountability fade like shadows under a flickering streetlight. At the time she penned these courageous letters, I too reached out to Turnbull—a man with a heritage of engaging in matters concerning the public, yet burdened by murky waters of his predecessors. I shared an exhaustive timeline of events with Cormann and a lawyer in Hamilton, Victoria, culminating in a statutory declaration on July 26, 2019, that was meticulously crafted but ultimately drowned in bureaucratic indifference.

But the darkness doesn't merely lie in sealed documents; it extends to chilling allegations of child sexual assault against Senator Bob Collins, whose shadow casts a long pall over Parliament House, Canberra. Such grisly crimes have been documented extensively, a grim reminder of the malevolence that festers in high places—poisoning not just the political landscape, but the very fabric of society.

Ann Garms’ August 17 letter uncovers a grave truth: Wayne Goss, the former Premier of Queensland, disclosed that gaslighting tactics were employed against the COT Cases. This revelation isn't mere gossip; it comes from a credible source within the government, raising the spectre of calculated manipulation.

The suicide of Senator Bob Collins, occurring just before he was set to face serious charges, adds a chilling twist to this narrative. Collins was intertwined in the COT Cases, exacerbating an already convoluted web of deceit. Our desperate pursuit of essential documents, promised to us by Collins' office and vital for our arbitration claims against Telstra, was met with frustrating silence—an eerie echo of promises broken.

Is it too far-fetched to consider that the government was willfully concealing critical evidence? Especially while delving into Collins’ horrific allegations? Compounding these dark suspicions is the unsettling fact that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) were investigating Telstra for allegedly intercepting our arbitration documents and monitoring our communications. A sordid blend of the personal and the political casts a pall over legitimate inquiries, dragging everyone into a vortex of complicity and betrayal.

A closer examination of the COT story unveils a disconcerting reality: despite government assurances, Telstra continued to employ the legal services of Freehill Hollingdale & Page. This hypocrisy screams for scrutiny, as the government had claimed to eliminate Freehill from any COT involvement. Yet, in the shadows of arbitration, Freehill remained engaged—falsifying signatures on critical legal documents, signing off on counter-witness statements as if they were gospel truth, even when such signatures had never been made.

 

Absent Justice - My Story

 

The document from March 1994 (AUSTEL’s Adverse Findingsreveals a troubling reality: government officials tasked with investigating my ongoing telephone issues found my claims against Telstra to be valid. This was not merely an oversight; it indicates a deliberate pattern of misconduct that played out between Points 2 and 212. It is chilling to consider that, had the arbitrator been furnished with this critical evidence, he would likely have awarded me far greater compensation for my substantial business losses. 

Three decades have dragged on since these chilling events unfolded. But Freehill Hollingdale & Page, now cloaked as Herbert Smith Freehills Melbourne, remains disturbingly silent about their actions, which have wreaked unchecked havoc on my life. Their blatant disregard for legality fuels an unconscionable sense of injustice—one that lingers, festering like a wound left untreated. The silence from those who should bear responsibility only amplifies the haunting query: When will the truth, shrouded in darkness, finally emerge?

It was only after this event, and the fact that Telstra was not abiding by all parties in the third week of November 1993 and not arbitration, that I aimed to articulate that 47% of my lost revenues were attributable to a singular club loss. Despite presenting compelling evidence, which included the fact that the AFP had specifically instructed us not to divulge this vital information to Telstra during the AFP's protracted fourteen-month investigation, the arbitrator inexplicably refused to accept it. Initially, he assured me that he would consider my evidence once the AFP allowed me to submit my 'Over Forties Single Club' information to the arbitration process; however, he ultimately failed to honour that commitment. This refusal highlights the deeply flawed nature of the arbitration process, which appeared to prioritise the protection of Telstra's already tarnished reputation over delivering a just and equitable resolution.

I began piecing together the menu bar above in 2007 after receiving a government communications regulatory report that AUSTEL had deliberately concealed, both before and during my government-endorsed arbitration process in 1994. It wasn't until November 2007 that I discovered AUSTEL (now the Australian Communications and Media Authority - ACMA) had compiled an entirely different account of their investigations into my ongoing telephone issues than what was presented to the arbitrator in my case. Had I been privy to those findings, which proved I had a substantially stronger case against Telstra (the new defendants in my arbitration), the arbitrator would have been compelled to award me a significantly greater compensation payout. This damning evidence, supplied to me through the Freedom of Information Act, is attached as AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings, further highlighting the depths of this unconscionable betrayal.

In February 1994, I received a troubling communication from the Australian Federal Police (AFP) that would irrevocably alter the course of my business. The AFP explicitly directed me to meticulously sift through the telephone complaints lodged by my single-club patrons since 1990, carefully distinguishing them from a multitude of grievances filed by various educational institutions and organisations throughout the 1990s. This was no regular administrative task; instead, it represented a crucial and urgent measure to confront an imminent crisis of alarming magnitude.

The situation was even more distressing than I could have ever imagined. In a troubling twist of events, the arbitrator, seemingly in collusion with Telstra, which had been under investigation by the Australian Federal Police (AFP), three months before the commencement of my arbitration for having intercepted my phone conversations and hacked into my arbitration faxes and the faxs to and from the Telecommuications Industry was compelled by the AFP to clarify why Telstra employees believed it necessary to intercept my private telephone conversations with various patrons from a singles club. The AFP was also looking into the unsettling possibility that my confidential faxes exchanged with the singles club had been hacked. This breach not only jeopardised the privacy of my Singles Club patrons but also raised serious questions about the disappearance of vital arbitration-related faxes, suggesting a direct connection to the alarming circumstances I now found myself in during this government-endorsed arbitration.

 

Absent Justice - Deception Continues

 

Despite the arbitrator being fully informed of these troubling issues, he shockingly disallowed any evidence related to the singles club from being entered into the arbitration process. To make matters worse, he pointedly stated that my diaries lacked chronological order because I had failed to organise them in a proper folder. This unfortunate misunderstanding stemmed from a recommendation made by the AFP, which had suggested that I include all prior fault statements in my records, along with the emotional expressions documented in my rough complaint notes.

Denise McBurnie, the attorney representing Telstra, emphasised the critical importance of compiling these documents meticulously. She insisted that I required a comprehensive and detailed record of the phone complaints that Telstra had acknowledged, warning that failure to comply would result in Telstra's refusal to investigate my persistent telephone issues. These issues mirrored the very challenges that the AFP had faced during their inquiries. Ultimately, I was instructed to meticulously record these statements in my physical diaries, ensuring that I created a reliable secondary record of the ongoing frustrations and challenges I was facing during this complex and troubling ordeal.

The COT Cases revealed a significant network of corruption and treachery involving Freehill, Hollingdale & Page in their dealings with these matters. Robing Davey, the Chairman of AUSTEL, explicitly stated that Freehill, Hollingdale & Page would have no further involvement in the COT Case issues, as detailed in point 40 of the Prologue Evidence File No/2). Nevertheless, contrary to this official declaration, Freehill proceeded to serve as Telstra's arbitration lawyers in all principal COT arbitrations, marking a notable deviation from established protocol.

 

Telstra-Corruption-Freehill-Hollingdale & Page
Telstra-Corruption-Freehill-Hollingdale & Page

Corrupt practices persisted throughout the COT arbitrations, flourishing in secrecy and obscurity. These insidious actions have managed to evade necessary scrutiny. Notably, the phone issues persisted for years following the conclusion of my arbitration, established to rectify these faults

Confronting Despair
Confronting Despair

The independent arbitration consultants demonstrated a concerning lack of impartiality. Instead of providing clear and objective insights, their guidance to the arbitrator was often marked by evasive language, misleading statements, and, at times, outright falsehoods.

Flash Backs – China-Vietnam
Flash Backs – China-Vietnam

In 1967, Australia participated in the Vietnam War. I was on a ship transporting wheat to China, where I learned China was redeploying some of it to North Vietnam. Chapter 7, "Vietnam—Vietcong," discusses the link between China and my phone issues.

A Twenty-Year Marriage Lost
A Twenty-Year Marriage Lost

As bookings declined, my marriage came to an end. My ex-wife, seeking her fair share of our venture, left me with no choice but to take responsibility for leaving the Navy without adequately assessing the reliability of the phone service in my pursuit of starting a business.

Salvaging What I Could
Salvaging What I Could

Mobile coverage was nonexistent, and business transactions were not conducted online. Cape Bridgewater had only eight lines to service 66 families—132 adults. If four lines were used simultaneously, the remaining 128 adults would have only four lines to serve their needs.

Lies Deceit And Treachery
Lies Deceit And Treachery

I was unaware of Telstra's unethical and corrupt business practices. It has now become clear that various unethical organisational activities were conducted secretly. Middle management was embezzling millions of dollars from Telstra.

An Unlocked Briefcase
An Unlocked Briefcase
On June 3, 1993, Telstra representatives visited my business and, in an oversight, left behind an unlocked briefcase. Upon opening it, I discovered evidence of corrupt practices concealed from the government, playing a significant role in the decline of Telstra's telecommunications network.
A Government-backed Arbitration
A Government-backed Arbitration

An arbitration process was established to hide the underlying issues rather than to resolve them. The arbitrator, the administrator, and the arbitration consultants conducted the process using a modified confidentiality agreement. In the end, the process resembled a kangaroo court.

Not Fit For Purpose
Not Fit For Purpose

AUSTEL investigated the contents of the Telstra briefcases. Initially, there was disbelief regarding the findings, but this eventually led to a broader discussion that changed the telecommunications landscape. I received no acknowledgement from AUSTEL for not making my findings public.
&am

A Non-Graded Arbitrator
A Non-Graded Arbitrator

Who granted the financial and technical advisors linked to the arbitrator immunity from all liability regarding their roles in the arbitration process? This decision effectively shields the arbitration advisors from any potential lawsuits by the COT claimants concerning misconduct or negligence.<

The AFP Failed Their Objective
The AFP Failed Their Objective

In September 1994, two officers from the AFP met with me to address Telstra's unauthorised interception of my telecommunications services. They revealed that government documents confirmed I had been subjected to these violations. Despite this evidence, the AFP did not make a finding.&am

The Promised Documents Never Arrived
The Promised Documents Never Arrived

In a February 1994 transcript of a pre-arbitration meeting, the arbitrator involved in my arbitration stated that he "would not determination on incomplete information.". The arbitrator did make a finding on incomplete information.

 
Blowing the whistle  

If revealing actions that harm others is viewed as morally unacceptable, why do governments encourage their citizens to report such crimes and injustices? This contradiction highlights an essential aspect of civic duty in a democratic society. When individuals bravely expose wrongdoing, they often earn the title of "whistleblower." This term encompasses a complex reality: it represents the honour and integrity that come with standing up for truth and justice while also carrying the burden of stigma and potential personal consequences, such as workplace retaliation or social ostracism.

In this challenging context, a crucial question arises: Should we celebrate and support those who risk their security and reputation to expose misconduct, thereby fostering a culture of accountability and transparency? Or should we condemn their actions, viewing them as threats to stability and order? The answer to this question can significantly influence the ethics of openness within our communities and shape how society values integrity versus conformity. Ultimately, creating an environment that supports whistleblowers may be essential for nurturing a just and equitable society.

 

Books Written Concurrently - Absent Justice

 

We are in the process of developing twelve captivating chapters, numbered from 1 to 12, for an upcoming documentary that promises to engage and inform. Each chapter is undergoing meticulous refinement to enhance the speech patterns, ensuring that the narrative flows smoothly and resonates with our audience. The statements presented in these chapters have been rigorously edited and verified for factual accuracy, providing a solid foundation that does not require further revision.

To bring our story to life, we will enrich each chapter with evocative images that capture the essence of the narrative. These visuals will serve to deepen the viewer's understanding and emotional connection to the material. I am committed to completing the image editing process by mid-July 2025, ensuring that every detail is thoughtfully curated. With most chapters already in their final edited form, we are on track to create a cohesive and compelling narrative that will leave a lasting impact.

 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1

Learn about government corruption and the dirty deeds used by the government to cover up these horrendous injustices committed against 16 Australian citizens

Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Betrayal deceit disinformation duplicity falsehood fraud hypocrisy lying mendacity treachery and trickery. This sums up the COT government endorsed arbitrations.
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Ending bribery corruption means holding the powerful to account and closing down the systems that allows bribery, illicit financial flows, money laundering, and the enablers of corruption to thrive.
Chapter 4
Chapter 4

Learn about government corruption and the dirty deeds used by the government to cover up these horrendous injustices committed against 16 Australian citizens. Government corruption within the public service affected most if not all of the COT arbitrations. 

Chapter 5
Chapter 5
Corruption is contagious and does not respect sectoral boundaries. Corruption involves duplicity and reduces levels of morality and trust.
Chapter 6
Chapter 6
Anti-corruption policies need to be used in anti-corruption reforms and strategy. Corruption metrics and corruption risk assessment is good governance
Chapter 7
Chapter 7

Bribery and Corruption happens in the shadows, often with the help of professional enablers such as bankers, lawyers, accountants and real estate agents, opaque financial systems and anonymous shell companies that allow corruption schemes to flourish and the corrupt to launder their wealth.

Chapter 8
Chapter 8
Corrupt practices in government and the results of those corrupt practices become problematic enough – but when that corruption becomes systemic in more than one operation, it becomes cancer that endangers the welfare of the world's democracy.
Chapter 9
Chapter 9

Corruption in government, including non-government self-regulators, undermines the credibility of that government. It erodes the trust of its citizens who are left without guidance are the feel of purpose. Bribery and Corruption is cancer that destroys economic growth and prosperity. 

Chapter 10
Chapter 10

The horrendous, unaddressed crimes perpetrated against the COT Cases during government-endorsed arbitrations administered by the Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman have never been investigated. 

Chapter 11
Chapter 11

This type of skulduggery is treachery, a Judas kiss with dirty dealing and betrayal. This is dirty pool and crookedness and dishonest. This conduct fester’s corruption. It is as bad, if not worse than double-dealing and cheating those who trust you.&a

Chapter 12
Chapter 12
Absentjustice.com - the website that triggered the deeper exploration into the world of political corruption, it stands shoulder to shoulder with any true crime story.

 

 

Who We Are

Absent Justice - My Story

Children's lives could be at risk

Comments made from the Herald Sun newspaper dated 30 August 1993, confirm just how damaging some of these newspaper articles were to my already ailing business, with statements like:

“The Royal Children’s Hospital has told a holiday camp operators in Portland that it cannot send chronically ill children there because of Telecom’s poor phone service. The hospital has banned trips after fears that the children’s lives could be at risk in a medical emergency if the telephone service to the Portland camp continued to malfunction”.

The centre’s stand follows letters from schools, community groups, companies and individuals who have complained about the phone service at Portland’s Cape Bridgewater Holiday camp.”

Youths from the Royal Children’s Centre for Adolescent Health, who were suffering from “chronic illnesses”, visited the camp earlier this year.   

Group leader Ms Louise Rolls said in a letter to the camp the faulty phones had endangered lives and the hospital would not return to the camp unless the phone service could be guaranteed” Arbitrator File No/90

After the Melbourne Children's Hospital recorded a near-death experience involving me rushing a sick child with cancer to the Portland Hospital, which is 18 kilometres away from my holiday camp, the new owners of my business faced declining sales. This decline continued until at least 2006, thirteen years after the tragic event at the Children's Hospital → Chapter 4 The New Owners Tell Their Story

Learn More ⟶

Who We Are

 

Absent Justice Ebook

 

Read About Our Dealings With

Learn More ⟶

Quote Icon

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

This is the compelling story of a group of ordinary small business owners who found themselves in a David-and-Goliath struggle against one of the country's largest corporations—Telstra. For years, these dedicated individuals faced a barrage of phone issues that severely compromised their ability to run their businesses effectively. Time and again, when they reported the problems, Telstra responded with the dismissive phrase "No fault found," even though compelling evidence, meticulously documented in this publication and available on our website, clearly demonstrated that faults did exist, as illustrated in AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings.

The situation grew more dire as Telstra and its legal arbitration defence team resorted to manipulating the judicial process through dubious and unethical tactics. They intercepted critical faxes, failed to deliver crucial Freedom of Information documents—sometimes months, or even years late, and often riddled with extensive censorship that rendered them nearly unintelligible. They even destroyed vital documentary evidence while fabricating information that cast doubt on the legitimacy of the COT Four's claims.

Throughout this chaotic arbitration process, the arbitrator overlooked the key issues at the heart of our claim. Despite our persistent efforts to draw attention to these points, we found ourselves met with silence and indifference. Meanwhile, the regulatory bodies tasked with oversight—Austel, representing the government's interests, and the TIO, advocating for the telecommunications carriers—failed to rein in Telstra’s activities, appearing to collude in the struggle against our pursuit of justice.

This series of events highlights a profound breakdown of justice, far exceeding the initial concerns of simple phone malfunctions. We were merely asking for reliable phone service—an essential tool for conducting our businesses smoothly and efficiently.

Like most telephone users, each COT member once assumed that Telstra’s skilled technicians could easily detect and resolve their phone faults. Yet, the refrain of "No fault found" persisted, and the problems continued without resolution, echoing through our arbitration proceedings and into the years that followed, leaving devastating impacts on our livelihoods. The situation was perplexing: in a world where nearly everyone relied on telecommunication, how could a system designed to serve the public go so profoundly wrong? What was truly happening behind the scenes?

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us