Mr Bates vs The Post Office-Absent Justice

PLEASE NOTE:

This Mr Bates vs The Post Office page is still in draft format as of 24/4/24

 

Exhibit CAV P3- Exhibit 8- Exhibit 9 is a critical piece of evidence that validates the authenticity of my arbitration Letter of Claim, submitted on 15 June 1994, and my subsequent response to Telstra's false witness statements. The report by the government communications regulator, AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings, dated March 1994, confirms that my claims against Telstra, as investigated by government public servants between points 2 to 212, were indeed valid. Therefore, AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings serves as concrete proof of the factual nature of my Letter of Claim and my reply to Telstra's defence. It is unacceptable that despite the government officials validating my claims as early as 4 March 1994, six weeks before I signed the arbitration agreement on 21 April 1994, I was made to incur over $300,000 in arbitration fees to prove an already established fact. This situation is outrageous, and the government must be accountable for its actions. Justice must be served.

Please find below a link to my three-minute YouTube video, which presents an introduction of myself and my earnest commitment to revealing the authentic truth surrounding the COT story. It is imperative to ensure that this story is shared without any manipulation, which is contrary to the unethical conduct exhibited by Telstra and the arbitrator during the COT arbitration. Their actions caused severe damage to the COT Cases and their families' businesses and personal lives, similar to the unfortunate British Post Office scandal that devastated the lives of small business operators. I firmly believe that exposing the truth behind the COT story will bring justice to the COT Cases and their families. The video highlights my passion for this cause. It provides a clear sense of my unwavering commitment to ensuring that the COT story is rightfully shared and prevents such unethical conduct from happening again. I would be grateful if you could find the time to view my video and gain a clear understanding of my dedication to this cause.

Are you sceptical about the truth behind my COT story? I understand that you might need immediate proof, and I have just the solution for you. Click on the Evidence Files Corruption in Arbitration, and you will find mini-reports and evidence files that prove Telstra's management mistreatment of small business operators. These reports and evidence files will convince you that my story is not only true but essential for the Australian government to investigate further. But, if you want an in-depth understanding of the story and the crooked lawyers and government regulators involved in covering up the crimes committed against the COT Cases, then view some of the links attached to Evidence Files Corruption in Arbitration. The similarities between the UK Post Office story shown on Channel 7 and the Casualties of Telstra story on absentjustice.com are striking.

Both stories expose the systemic corruption in government-owned organizations. Telstra was wholly owned by the Australian government when the story broke in 1993. Therefore, I urge you to spread the word about the Casualties of Telstra and share them both with your local Member of Parliament. Click here to watch the Channel 7 trailer for ‘Mr Bates vs the Post Office’, which went to air in Australia in February 2024. The latest update of that terrible story is in the following YouTube link: https://youtu.be/MyhjuR5g1Mc.

The actions of the Australian government's communication regulator towards Telstra customers are alarming. The regulator was willing to jeopardize the lives of over 120,000 individual customers while keeping vital information hidden from those affected. This has led to significant financial losses for many businesses and incorrect billing for telephone calls passing through Telstra's Ericsson-installed telephone exchanges.

The Ericsson equipment has known faults that cause software billing problems, similar to the scandal that occurred with Britain's Post Office and their Fujitsu software accounting equipment. It is unacceptable that such problems are being concealed and not addressed.

Ericsson, the Swedish telecommunications giant, played an undeniable and significant role in a communication fiasco. Shockingly, they were allowed to purchase the government's telecommunications arbitration consultant. This consultant failed to accurately record the severity of the ongoing systemic billing difficulties related to Ericsson AXE Telstra exchanges.

As previously illustrated, the British Post Office and their Fujitsu software accounting equipment caused extensive chaos and severely impacted thousands of lives, as was the case in Australia.

It is important to highlight that the United States Department of Justice raised bribery and corruption charges against Ericsson on December 19th, 2019. As reported in the Australian media, these were serious allegations related to the company's questionable business practices.

"One of Telstra's key partners in the building out of their 5G network in Australia is set to fork out over $1.4 billion after the US Department of Justice accused them of bribery and corruption on a massive scale and over a long period of time.

Sweden's telecoms giant Ericsson has agreed to pay more than $1.4 billion following an extensive investigation which saw the Telstra-linked Company 'admitting to a years-long campaign of corruption in five countries to solidify its grip on telecommunications business." (https://www.channelnews.com.au/key-telstra-5g-partner-admits-to-bribery-corruption/)

The US Department of Justice has accused Ericsson of bribery and corruption.  

I reiterate Ericsson is the same company whose telecommunication equipment was under investigation by the COT arbitrator. As for bribery in the case against Telstra, Senate Evidence File No 21 Senate Hansard dated 27 Feb 1998 re kick-backs and bribes shows Telstra paid kickbacks and bribes to a number of Australian politicians and government bureaucrats. 

It is imperative to underscore the Ericsson link above as part of an ongoing effort to secure an impartial investigation by the Australian government regarding my claims against Telstra. Specifically, the government is requested to investigate whether it was appropriate for Ericsson to have procured Lane Telecommunications Pty Ltd during the period in which Lane was serving as the officially appointed arbitration technical consultant assigned to the COT arbitrator, whose task it was to determine the value of the COT cases' claims against Telstra.

Mr Bates vs The Post Office. Ending bribery corruption means holding the powerful to account.