Search Results
Please enter a search phrase and try again.
Please enter a search phrase and try again.
“Why did Telecom advise the Commonwealth Ombudsman that Telecom withheld FOI documents from Alan Smith because Alan Smith provided Telecom FOI documents to the Australian Federal Police during their investigation?”
After receiving a hollow response from Telstra, which the senator, the AFP and I all knew was utterly false, the senator states:
“…Why would Telecom withhold vital documents from the AFP? Also, why would Telecom penalise COT members for providing documents to the AFP which substantiate that Telecom had conducted unauthorised interceptions of COT members’ communications and subsequently dealt in the intercepted information by providing that information to Telecom’s external legal advisers and others?”
The withholding of relevant documents significantly impacted my submission to the arbitrator. Despite cooperating with the Australian Federal Police (AFP) in their investigation into the illicit interception of phone conversations and arbitration-related faxes, no one has looked into where my intercepted faxes ended up. (Senate Evidence File No 31)
This website is a fearless exposé of the corruption within the bureaucracy during several government-endorsed arbitrations. It leaves no stone unturned in uncovering the identities of the culprits responsible for these despicable crimes and their current positions within the government. The website reveals the deeply ingrained culture of systemic corruption that has marred the arbitration and mediation processes endorsed by the Australian government. Despite the seriousness of the crimes committed against the Casualties of Telstra, the government has chosen to turn a blind eye to the situation, shielding its government-funded agencies, who were complicit in committing numerous crimes. The telecom giant Telstra held the monopoly on communications and let the network deteriorate into a state of disrepair. When four small business owners approached Telstra with severe communication problems, they went into arbitration seeking justice.
However, the arbitrations were a sham, and the appointed arbitrator allowed Telstra to minimize the casualties of Telstra (COT) members' claims and losses. Moreover, the arbitrator let Telstra run the arbitrations, which allowed the carrier to commit serious crimes. Despite the seriousness of these crimes, the Australian government and the Australian Federal Police have failed to hold Telstra or the other entities involved in this deceit accountable.
Government Corruption. Corruption in the public service, where misleading and deceptive conduct has spuriously over more than two decades perverted the course of justice.
The criminal delinquency of those involved in the COT Cases corrupted arbitrations continued to practive their evil and crooked style of justice on other citizens who, like the Casualties of Telstra have had their lives ruined.
This type of skulduggery is treachery, a Judas kiss with dirty dealing and betrayal. This is dirty pool and crookedness and dishonest. This conduct fester’s corruption. It is as bad, if not worse than double-dealing and cheating those who trust the ground you walk on. Sheer Evil.<
Corruption in government, including non-government self-regulators, undermines the credibility of that government. It erodes the trust of its citizens.
“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”
Senator Carr
The following is a powerful and thought-provoking message Senate Evidence File No 12 contains a chilling account of the events that transpired when Alan Smith, the author of this website, was threatened twice by the Chair of the Australian Senate. These threats were made on 16 August 2001 and 6 December 2004, which warned me that I would be charged with contempt of the Senate if he disclosed the 6 and 9 July 1998 In-Camera Hansard. It is unbelievable that the Senate would go to great lengths to hide crucial information that could have won sixteen arbitration and mediation appeals in 1998.
This injustice clearly violates democracy and freedom of speech. Despite being wholly owned by the government, Telstra's gross misconduct during several arbitrations and mediation procedures was ignored. The findings of misconduct should have been a matter of public interest, yet they were kept under parliamentary privilege. It is unacceptable that this information continues to harm the victims of this injustice.
In fact, during the 9 July 1998 Senate debate, one National Party Senator, Ron Boswell, verbally attacked a very senior Telstra arbitration officer, stating, “You are really a disgrace, the whole lot of you,” he then apologised to the chair of the Senate committee for this outburst, stating:
“Madam, I withdraw that, but I do say this: this has got a unity ticket going right through this parliament. This has united every person in this parliament – something that no-one else has ever had the ability to do – and Telstra has done it magnificently. They have got the Labor Party, they have got the National Party, they have got the Liberal Party, they have got the Democrats and they have got the Greens – all united in a singular distrust of Telstra. You have achieved a miracle.”
I have created the website absentjustice.com to balance the scales of justice. It's time to demand that the government take action and correct this wrong Chapter 2 - Julian Assange - Hacking - we did not listen