Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

Search Results

Please enter a search phrase and try again.

Who We Are

Until the late 1990s, the Australian government wholly owned Australia’s telephone network and the communications carrier, Telecom (today privatised and called Telstra). Telecom held the monopoly on communications and let the network deteriorate into disrepair. When four small business owners had severe communication problems, they went into arbitration with Telstra. The arbitrations were a sham: the appointed arbitrator not only allowed Telstra to minimise the casualties of Telstra (COT) members’ claims and losses but also bowed down to Telstra and let the carrier run the arbitrations. Telstra committed serious crimes during the arbitrations, yet the Australian government and the Australian Federal Police have not held Telstra, or the other entities involved in this deceit, accountable. 

It is crucial to highlight that every detail presented on this website is factual and is backed by irrefutable evidence that can be easily found on the site itself. Additionally, after a recent discussion with other members of the COT group, we have decided to release our stories to the public in their current form despite the illness of two of our members and the deaths of three. We believe that sharing our stories and the evidence we have provided will shed light on important issues that need to be addressed. We urge you to take a look at our stories and evidence.

Learn More ⟶

Who We Are
Absent Justice Ebook

Read Alan's book

  1. Australia knowingly sold wheat to China, aware China was redeploying it to North Vietnam while North Vietnam soldiers were killing and maiming  Australian, New Zealand and USA troops fighting in North Vietnam. Footnote pages 82 to 85 of the paper: FOOD AND TRADE IN LATE MAOIST CHINA, 1960-1978, prepared by Tianxiao Zhu. ​​

  2. To have allowed Ericsson (who was under investigation during an arbitration) to purchase the arbitration technical consultant who was investigating Ericsson meant that the evidence collected by the consultant became the property of Ericsson was unlawful: Chapter 5 - US Department of Justice vs Ericsson of Sweden  

  3. Allowing the defence to use surveillance equipment to gain an advantage during arbitration was unlawful: Open Letter File No/12 and File No/13.

  4. Withholding discovery documents in an arbitration procedure was unlawful: Absent Justice Part 2 - Chapter 14 - Was it Legal or Illegal?

  5. Tampering with evidence in an arbitration was unlawful: Tampering With Evidence.

  6. Relying on defence documents that are known to be flawed was unlawful: Telstra's Falsified SVT Report  and Telstra's Falsified BCI Report

  7. The government's concealment of vital evidence from me during arbitration was a breach of trust: AUSTEL’s Adverse Findings, at points to 212.

  8. The arbitrator ordered the removal of evidence from two reports: Chapter 1 - The collusion continues  and Chapter 2 - Inaccurate and Incomplete

Read About Our Dealings With

Learn More ⟶

Quote Icon

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

The Australian Government-endorsed arbitrations are marred with corruption, and reporting the events without supporting exhibits is difficult. We need to prove that the government provided privileged information to the then-Australian Government-owned telecommunications carrier and concealed it from fellow Australian citizens, the claimants.

The story is unbelievable, but the evidence is irrefutable. We must expose the collusion between an arbitrator, various appointed government watchdogs, and the defendants. The defendants used equipment connected to their network to screen faxed material, stored it without consent, and used it to benefit their arbitration defence to the detriment of the claimants.

It's a breach of trust, and we need to know how many other Australian arbitration processes have been subjected to this type of hacking. Is electronic eavesdropping - hacking into confidential documentation - still happening during legitimate Australian arbitrations? A report confirmed that confidential, arbitration-related documents were secretly and illegally screened before they arrived or left Parliament House Canberra, but it has not been released to the public.

We urge the Australian Government to disclose the report. By doing so, it acknowledges my claims are valid.

Read More ⟶

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us