Download Attachments
-
Senate Evidence File No 1 20-9-95 Senate Hansard A Matter of Public Interest
-
Senate Evidence File No 2A & 2B dated 24-6-1997 keeping secret files on Alan Smith
-
Senate Evidence File No 3 -Telstra prepares their own rules of arbitration
-
Senate Evidence File No 4 Transcripts showing arbitrator misled the arbitration pre-hearing
-
Senate Evidence File No 5 proof the arbitrator had seen Telstra's rules of arbitration
-
Senate Evidence File No 6 it is clear the arbitrator did see Telstra's rules of arbitration - but said he had not seen them
-
Senate Evidence File No 7 letters from the Commonwealth Ombudsman's office in support of my claims
-
Senate Evidence File No 8 arbitrators letter 12 May 1995 not a credible arbitration agreement
-
Senate Evidence File No 9 my lawyers Letter to Senator Boswell arbitration process not transparent
-
Senate Evidence File No 10 Senator Harris supports the 16 COT Cases who were discriminated against
-
Senate Evidence File No 11 proof 150,000 FOI documents were provided to the five litmus COT test Cases
-
Senate Evidence File No 12 two letters to me from the Senate threatening to hold me in contempt of the Senate
-
Senate Evidence File No 13A & 13B prove the 5 litmus COT Cases were assisted with preparing their arbitration claims by Telstra and the Senate
-
Senate Evidence File No 14 letter from TIO to secretary of Senate admitting to withholing copies of Telstra's rules of arbitration from the claimants
-
Senate Evidence File No 15 letter from Senator Coonan telling me maybe I should takeTelstra to court
-
Senate Evidence File No 16 - Bad bureaucrats
-
Arbitrator File No 17 Arbitration Project Manager
-
Senate Evidence File No 18 Two emails from the government asking Testra to assess my claims against Telstra
-
Senate Evidence File No 19 -3 emails which should be read in conjunction with the Senate link
-
Senate Evidence File No 20 letter from Senator Barnaby Joyce 15 Sept 2006 our claims would be finaly investigated
-
Senate Evidence File No 21 Senate Hansard dated 27 Feb 1998 re kick-backs and bribes
-
Senate Evidence File No 22 my joint letter to the Chairman of Telstra, TIO Council and Telstra CEO proving Telstra tampered with evidence during myarbitration
-
Senate Evidence File No 23 further proof that Telstra tampered with my TF 200 telephone during my arbitration
-
Senate Evidence File No 24 - Senate Hansard dated 2 Sept 1993 - Senator Alston
-
Senate Evidence File No 25 transcrpts proves that AUSTEL provided Telstra with a copy of AUSTEL's draft COT findings
-
Senate Evidence File No 26 shows AUSTEL were aware Telstra's testing equipment used at my premises caused further telephone faults
-
Senate Evidence File No 27 - AUSTEL's COT Report page 91 & 92 proves how important the service verification testing of the COT Cases businesses were
-
Senate Evidence File No 28 - these government archives documents do not match AUISTEL's adverse findings against Telstra
-
Senate Evidence File No 29 - these two pages should be read in conjunction with the Senate link
-
Senate Evidence File No 30 These pages should be read in conjunction with the Senate link
-
Senate Evidence File No 31 - this Senate Hansard proves the Senate was aware of the threats Telstra made to me during my arbitration
-
Senate Evidence File No 32 is a letter from the Commonwealth Ombudsman re the vetting by Telstra of my requested FOI documents
-
Senate Evidence File No 33 - shows Telstra waited a whole 12 months before releasing my requested FOI documents after my arbitration was over
-
Senate Evidence File No 34 - a letter from the TIO dated 10 Jan 1996 proving he did not act in my best interest
-
Senate Evidence File No 35 - letter from Senator Kim Carr - in support of my manuscript
-
Senate Evidence File No 36 Senate Hansard - 'Stop the COT Cases At All Cost' from proving their claims
-
Senate Evidence File No 37 & 38 proof that Telstra was destroying information on requested FOI documents
-
Senate Evidence File No 39 - A Telstra whistleblower advises the government that Telstra was destroying evidence needed by the COT Cases
-
Senate Evidence File No 40 - these three documents shows Telstra can store faxed documents for viewing purposes (these documents should be read with Senate link )
-
Senate Evidence File No 41 this letter from Telstra to the TIO shows there was a secret second appointed arbitrator
-
Senate Evidence File No 42 - this letter of 18 April 1995 from the Resource Unit proves there were 'forces at work' that had derailed my arbitration
-
Senate Evidence File No 43 - Sister Maureen Burke - Only I know from personal experience that your story is true
-
Senate Evidence File No/ 44 Part 1 Australian Federal Police AFP Transcripts - interview at Cape Bridgewater
-
Senate Evidence File No/45 Part 2 Australian Federal Police AFP Transcripts - Interview at Cape Bridgewater
-
Senate Evidence File No 46 - Suspect Sabotage - maybe the bug has slipped off
-
Senater Evidence File No/47 The statement in the 10 February 1994 letter from AUSTEL to Telstra stating: "...Yesterday we were called upon by officers of the Australian Federal Police in relation to the taping of the telephone services of the COT Cases" and that the nine tapes previously supplied by Telecom to AUSTEL were made available for the attention of the Commissioner of Police confirms our telephone conversations were taped.
-
Senate Evidence File No/48 - Telstra's Minutes (File Note) confirm the Arbitrator misled the pre-arbitration meeting of 17 Feb 1994
-
Senate Evidence File No/49 supports File/48 i.e. the Arbitrator misled the 17 Feb 1994 pre arbitration meeting.
-
Senate Evidence File No/50 TIO refuses to supply me arbitration documents in which to support my appeal
-
Senate Evidence File No/51 Telstra file notes confirm I was still being denied acess to arbitration documents six months ater my aritration was over
-
Senate Evidence File No/52 this document confirms the TO is aware how serious it was that a number of arbitration documents were withheld from me.
-
Senate Evidence File No/53 a copy of my fax journal showing three faxes faxed to the Victoria Police (Major Fraud Group) experienced problem's being sent
-
Senate Evidence File No/54 this stautory declaration confirms Telstra's ex security office beleived the Major Fraud Group officer phones were bugged during the COT investigations
-
Senate Evidence File No/55 two faxes from the Crown complex
-
Senate Evidence File No 56 - Senator Len Harris Public Media Releas dated 26 July 2002.
-
Senate Evidence File No 57 - Senate Len Harris Media Release dated 14 November 2002
-
Senate Evidence File No/58 Letter dated 20 August 1997 from Michael Brereton & Co (Lawyers) sent on my behalf to Senator Ron Boswell.
-
Senate Evidence File No/59 Letters from the Commonwealth Ombudsman's office from Feb 1997 to Oct 1997
-
Senate Evidence File No/60 Pages 82 to 88 from Senate Estimates Hansard dated 26 Sept, 1997 concerning the use of the Queensland Mental Health Act Re: Sandra Wolfes case
-
Senate Evidence File No/61 TIO report dated 26 September 1997 to the Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts
-
Senate Evidence File No/62 this letter from Telstra to the Commonwealth Ombudman Office was fax screened (intercepted) before arriving at its intended destination
-
Senate Evidence File No/63 Letter dated 16 November 2006 from Senator Barnaby Joyce to Senator Helen Coonan re her commitment to appoint an independent assessor to review the status of all outstanding CoT cases claims.